Position from 353 bills and votes and 6 statements, starting from a reputation prior of Right 26 — click any issue to see the reputation, the record and the shift.
Solo viewvs. Sneed · 2026vs. pick…
Strong (you're viewing)
Overall
17
Rt-lean
LeftCenterRight
Federal budget, taxes and spending
14
Rt-lean
▸
Business, finance and labor
16
Rt-lean
▸
Trade and industrial policy
15
Rt-lean
▸
Foreign policy, trade and defense
18
Rt-lean
▸
Health care
18
Rt-lean
▸
Education
16
Rt-lean
▸
Immigration
20
Rt-lean
▸
Crime and justice
16
Rt-lean
▸
Guns
19
Rt-lean
▸
Civil rights, gender and religion
19
Rt-lean
▸
Elections, representation and accountability
15
Rt-lean
▸
Federal power and civil liberties
18
Rt-lean
▸
Energy, environment, land and agriculture
17
Rt-lean
▸
Housing, transportation, technology and vice
16
Rt-lean
▸
Track is neutral — only the dot's position and distance-from-center number carry meaning.
The FEC doesn't name donors who give under $200, so their gifts count in Raised but not Itemized.
Odds are a market close, not a poll
What They Care About
How this is measured
Bubble size = how much of Dale W. Strong's sponsored bills, cosponsorships, campaign statements and tweets go to each domain. Votes are left out because they follow committee seats; domains a member's committees handle are discounted a little. Anything from the last 6 months counts double, so a topic they are on about right now grows. Darker = they have broken with their own party more often on that topic: the share of party-line votes since 2009 where they voted against their party's majority (gray = fewer than 8 such votes). Based on 6 sponsored, 69 cosponsored, 18 statements, 233 topical tweets. Click a bubble to open what they support and the bills and tweets behind it; click it again to close.
Strong (you're viewing)
Andrew SneedDemocrat · challenger · Left 28 from statements5%